" It 's good that people do not understand the operation of our banking and monetary system, because if you happen to think that triggered a revolution before tomorrow morning . "
Since the end of World War II the evolution of the global trading system is characterized by constant use of rhetoric "development".
trade, from a simple tool, has become an end in itself, a fascinating political prescription, a panacea for a magic wand all the problems.
Despite the benefits achieved in our society, the recipes offered by the banking system, political, national and supranational institutions, from trade liberalization have become an absolute size, which often transcends the specific economic and social conditions of countries that are called to apply them.
This work was born from the need to know the
economic aspects of the Bank of Italy, the banking system in general and of the main institutions of free trade.
The argument began to fascinate me when I had the pleasure of reading an article online that listed participants in the so-called shareholding of the Bank of Italy and I was extremely impressed, so much wanting to expand my knowledge on . In the result, and are still the major Italian banks, creating a sort of conflict of interest, given that by "controlling" the Bank of Italy would be delegated to the role of "controlled", with a role reversal .
Then, to better document, I discovered that this conflict was concerned with other central banks of foreign countries, including the U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve.
Appassionatomi topic of central banks, as a result of my research I came inevitably to a problem far more serious than just a conflict of interest between parent-controlled, but to what some call a paradox in the banking system, ie seigniorage.
In the course of my work, namely the second chapter, I tried to explain the origins of seigniorage, the beneficiaries and disadvantaged of the economic system.
Analyzing the seigniorage, I reflected on the loss of monetary sovereignty, the concept of induced value of money as expressed by Professor Auriti, the method used by the fractional reserve banks.
conclude the chapter by examining the Maastricht Treaty and in particular certain items present in it, food for accounts of the Bank of Italy and European Central Bank, the rise of public debt and the alternative of complementary and alternative currencies.
Just trying to figure out who were the recipients that drew the most out of everything, I could not help but to touch certain arguments which alluded to the existence of a global elite, composed of representatives of big business, politicians, oilmen, entrepreneurs and all those who have or may have the power to manipulate the rest of his time ' mankind to get essence of the benefits to their small circle of "elect", all names of the rest very often well hidden to ordinary people within the boards of directors of multinational or supranational institutions.
After some reading I have brought to light the knowledge of my dissertation that initially only seemed utopian, unrealistic (Such as the PNAC, which Project for the New American Century , setting out in a separate paragraph), but penetrating topic I know the plans illustrate a kind of future manipulated, as described in " 1984" by Orwell. The ultimate goal, according to the supposed elite, would be to bring a global economy, under a kind of global dictatorship, with a single army and a single currency.
The last part of the discussion illustrates the objectives and structure of the two most important institutions of the global economy, namely the International Monetary Fund and the Organisation World Trade Organization, and later criticized because they often have their own recipes, most of the time, created disadvantages and economic crises, especially in developing countries. The work ends with a brief assessment of the economic theory of liberalism with data taken from ' U.S. Census Bureau and based on considerations of the mathematician Ralph Gomory and economist William Baumol.
0 comments:
Post a Comment